| Goalkeeper saves percentage 
 
| # | Team | Gms. | Saves | % | 
|---|
 | 1. | Motor Zaporozhye | 12 | 78/233 | 33,48 |  | 2. | Meshkov Brest | 16 | 61/238 | 25,63 |  | 3. | Spartak Moscow | 12 | 35/138 | 25,36 |  | 4. | Tatran Prešov | 14 | 38/156 | 24,36 |  | 5. | PPD Zagreb | 14 | 28/128 | 21,88 |  | 6. | Vardar 1961 | 14 | 43/213 | 20,19 |  | 7. | Vojvodina | 13 | 39/198 | 19,70 |  | 8. | Metaloplastika | 12 | 23/117 | 19,66 |  | 9. | Eurofarm Pelister | 12 | 20/102 | 19,61 |  | 10. | Nexe | 14 | 25/137 | 18,25 |  | 11. | Beijing Sport University | 12 | 26/145 | 17,93 |  | 12. | Telekom Veszprem | 13 | 24/136 | 17,65 |  | Saves average 
 
| # | Team | Gms. | Saves | Avg. | 
|---|
 | 1. | Motor Zaporozhye | 12 | 78 | 6,50 |  | 2. | Meshkov Brest | 16 | 61 | 3,81 |  | 3. | Vardar 1961 | 14 | 43 | 3,07 |  | 4. | Vojvodina | 13 | 39 | 3,00 |  | 5. | Spartak Moscow | 12 | 35 | 2,92 |  | 6. | Tatran Prešov | 14 | 38 | 2,71 |  | 7. | Beijing Sport University | 12 | 26 | 2,17 |  | 8. | PPD Zagreb | 14 | 28 | 2,00 |  | 9. | Metaloplastika | 12 | 23 | 1,92 |  | 10. | Telekom Veszprem | 13 | 24 | 1,85 |  | 11. | Nexe | 14 | 25 | 1,79 |  | 12. | Eurofarm Pelister | 12 | 20 | 1,67 |  | Shot attempts allowed 
 
| # | Team | Gms. | Att.all. | Avg. | 
|---|
 | 1. | Motor Zaporozhye | 12 | 233 | 19,42 |  | 2. | Vojvodina | 13 | 198 | 15,23 |  | 3. | Vardar 1961 | 14 | 213 | 15,21 |  | 4. | Meshkov Brest | 16 | 238 | 14,88 |  | 5. | Beijing Sport University | 12 | 145 | 12,08 |  | 6. | Spartak Moscow | 12 | 138 | 11,50 |  | 7. | Tatran Prešov | 14 | 156 | 11,14 |  | 8. | Telekom Veszprem | 13 | 136 | 10,46 |  | 9. | Nexe | 14 | 137 | 9,79 |  | 10. | Metaloplastika | 12 | 117 | 9,75 |  | 11. | PPD Zagreb | 14 | 128 | 9,14 |  | 12. | Eurofarm Pelister | 12 | 102 | 8,50 |  |